> Hi
>
> We are in hard freeze. My understanding is that this are "optimizations" that
> can wait for 2.6:
> - my understanding from commit from message one and from quick look at
> the code is that this change is not needed for current users, is that
> correct?
> - we avoid a copy at the begi
Liang Li wrote:
> This patch fixed the flaws in qemu_put_compression_data function.
> and cleanup the code based on the change.
Hi
We are in hard freeze. My understanding is that this are
"optimizations" that can wait for 2.6:
- my understanding from commit from message one and from quick look
This patch fixed the flaws in qemu_put_compression_data function.
and cleanup the code based on the change.
Liang Li (2):
qemu-file: fix flaws of qemu_put_compression_data
migration: code clean up.
migration/qemu-file.c | 10 +-
migration/ram.c | 20
2 file
This patch fixed the flaws in qemu_put_compression_data function.
and cleanup the code based on the change.
Liang Li (2):
qemu-file: fix flaws of qemu_put_compression_data
migration: code clean up.
migration/qemu-file.c | 10 +-
migration/ram.c | 20
2 file