On 16/02/2017 14:27, Alexander Boettcher wrote:
> On 16.02.2017 13:57, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16/02/2017 13:57, Alexander Boettcher wrote:
>>> Hello Paolo,
>>>
>>> On 16.02.2017 12:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
As you noticed, the problem is that now cpu_vmexit is called without a
On 16.02.2017 13:57, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 16/02/2017 13:57, Alexander Boettcher wrote:
>> Hello Paolo,
>>
>> On 16.02.2017 12:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> As you noticed, the problem is that now cpu_vmexit is called without a
>>> cpu_restore_state before.
>>>
>>> The right fix is to pass
On 16/02/2017 13:57, Alexander Boettcher wrote:
> Hello Paolo,
>
> On 16.02.2017 12:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> As you noticed, the problem is that now cpu_vmexit is called without a
>> cpu_restore_state before.
>>
>> The right fix is to pass the retaddr to cpu_vmexit (via
>> cpu_svm_check_inter
Hello Paolo,
On 16.02.2017 12:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> As you noticed, the problem is that now cpu_vmexit is called without a
> cpu_restore_state before.
>
> The right fix is to pass the retaddr to cpu_vmexit (via
> cpu_svm_check_intercept_param); something like this untested patch:
...
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a short question/observation and a longer story.
>
> Short question:
>
> Between qemu 2.4.1 and 2.5.0 following snippet of code vanished:
>
> --- qemu-2.4.1/target-i386/mem_helper.c
> +++ qemu-2.5.0/target-i386/mem_helper.c
> @@ -122,11 +142,7 @@
> X86CPU *cpu = X86
Hello,
I have a short question/observation and a longer story.
Short question:
Between qemu 2.4.1 and 2.5.0 following snippet of code vanished:
--- qemu-2.4.1/target-i386/mem_helper.c
+++ qemu-2.5.0/target-i386/mem_helper.c
@@ -122,11 +142,7 @@
X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
CPUX8
