On 30 August 2011 08:00, Boris Figovsky
wrote:
> The second if statement should consider the original al register value,
> and not the new one.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell
(It took me some time to convince myself that the line
CF <- old_CF or (Carry from AL <- AL + 6)
in the Intel architectur
The second if statement should consider the original al register value,
and not the new one.
Signed-off-by: Boris Figovsky
---
target-i386/op_helper.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/op_helper.c b/target-i386/op_helper.c
index 1bbc3b5..1f
