On 01/27/2010 06:29 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 01/27/10 01:07, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/25/2010 06:54 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi all,
this patch fixes another bug in vnc_refresh: calling vnc_update_client
might cause v
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 01/27/10 01:07, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 01/25/2010 06:54 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> this patch fixes another bug in vnc_refresh: calling vnc_update_client
> >> might cause vs to be free()ed, in this case we cannot access vs->
On 01/27/10 01:07, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/25/2010 06:54 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi all,
this patch fixes another bug in vnc_refresh: calling vnc_update_client
might cause vs to be free()ed, in this case we cannot access vs->next
right after to examine the next item on the list.
Sign
On 01/25/2010 06:54 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Hi all,
this patch fixes another bug in vnc_refresh: calling vnc_update_client
might cause vs to be free()ed, in this case we cannot access vs->next
right after to examine the next item on the list.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
Applied
Hi all,
this patch fixes another bug in vnc_refresh: calling vnc_update_client
might cause vs to be free()ed, in this case we cannot access vs->next
right after to examine the next item on the list.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
---
diff --git a/vnc.c b/vnc.c
index cc2a26e..92facde 100644
-
