On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:53:25PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> since commit 261747f176f6 (vl: Use MachineClass instead of global
> QEMUMachine list) valgrind complains about the following:
>
> ==54082== 57 bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 365 of 729
> ==54082==at
Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
> On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 22:53 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> since commit 261747f176f6 (vl: Use MachineClass instead of global
>> QEMUMachine list) valgrind complains about the following:
>>
>> ==54082== 57 bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 365
On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 22:53 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> since commit 261747f176f6 (vl: Use MachineClass instead of global
> QEMUMachine list) valgrind complains about the following:
>
> ==54082== 57 bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 365 of 729
> ==54082==at 0x4031A
since commit 261747f176f6 (vl: Use MachineClass instead of global
QEMUMachine list) valgrind complains about the following:
==54082== 57 bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 365 of 729
==54082==at 0x4031AFE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:292)
==54082==by 0x4145569: g_malloc (