On 02/09/2016 20:10, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 04:56:49PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 02/09/2016 16:04, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> [...]
>>> Now, why exactly vhost-user-test needs accel=tcg and can't use
>>> accel=qtest?
>>
>> Because it uses iPXE to exercise the NIC.
>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 04:56:49PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/09/2016 16:04, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
[...]
> > Now, why exactly vhost-user-test needs accel=tcg and can't use
> > accel=qtest?
>
> Because it uses iPXE to exercise the NIC.
Is it used to actually exercise the NIC, or just to
On 02/09/2016 16:04, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:59:21AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/09/2016 21:34, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> 1) vhost_user_set_mem_table() fails because dev->mem->nregions is 0
>>> 2) dev->mem->nregions is supposed to get new entries based
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:59:21AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 01/09/2016 21:34, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > 1) vhost_user_set_mem_table() fails because dev->mem->nregions is 0
> > 2) dev->mem->nregions is supposed to get new entries based on the
> >memory listener callbacks
> > 3) vh
On 01/09/2016 21:34, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> 1) vhost_user_set_mem_table() fails because dev->mem->nregions is 0
> 2) dev->mem->nregions is supposed to get new entries based on the
>memory listener callbacks
> 3) vhost_region_add() gets called properly, and calls
>vhost_set_memory(), but
Eduardo Habkost writes:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:47:21PM -0700,
> no-re...@ec2-52-6-146-230.compute-1.amazonaws.com wrote:
> [...]
>> GTESTER check-qtest-x86_64
>> qemu-system-x86_64: Failed initializing vhost-user memory map, consider
>> using -object memory-backend-file share=on
>> qemu-s
Eduardo Habkost writes:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:39:37PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:41:52PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > On 01/09/2016 17:10, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> > > Ouch. It looks like the ordering requirements are messier than I
>> > > thought. vho
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:39:37PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:41:52PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 01/09/2016 17:10, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > Ouch. It looks like the ordering requirements are messier than I
> > > thought. vhost-user depends on the memory ba
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:41:52PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 01/09/2016 17:10, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > Ouch. It looks like the ordering requirements are messier than I
> > thought. vhost-user depends on the memory backends to be already
> > initialized.
>
> You could also look at delayin
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:52:42PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 01.09.2016 17:10, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:47:21PM -0700,
> > no-re...@ec2-52-6-146-230.compute-1.amazonaws.com wrote:
> > [...]
> >> GTESTER check-qtest-x86_64
> >> qemu-system-x86_64: Failed initi
On 01.09.2016 17:10, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:47:21PM -0700,
> no-re...@ec2-52-6-146-230.compute-1.amazonaws.com wrote:
> [...]
>> GTESTER check-qtest-x86_64
>> qemu-system-x86_64: Failed initializing vhost-user memory map, consider
>> using -object memory-backend-file
On 01/09/2016 17:10, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Ouch. It looks like the ordering requirements are messier than I
> thought. vhost-user depends on the memory backends to be already
> initialized.
You could also look at delaying initialization of vhost-user, not
sending anything on the wire until af
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:47:21PM -0700,
no-re...@ec2-52-6-146-230.compute-1.amazonaws.com wrote:
[...]
> GTESTER check-qtest-x86_64
> qemu-system-x86_64: Failed initializing vhost-user memory map, consider using
> -object memory-backend-file share=on
> qemu-system-x86_64: vhost_set_mem_table fa
Hi,
Your series failed automatic build test. Please find the testing commands and
their output below. If you have docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: Delay initialization of memory backends
Type: series
Message-id: 1472674630-18886-1-git
Initialization of memory backends may take a while when
prealloc=yes is used, depending on their size. Initializing
memory backends before chardevs may delay the creation of monitor
sockets, and trigger timeouts on management software that waits
until the monitor socket is created by QEMU. See, fo
15 matches
Mail list logo