On 5 March 2015 at 21:37, Tobias Nygren wrote:
> A couple of #ifdef changes necessary to use NetBSD's ucontext
> structs on sparc64 and arm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Nygren
> ---
> user-exec.c | 16 +++-
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to qemu master, sinc
On 8 March 2015 at 23:59, Tobias Nygren wrote:
> Standalone static binaries and basic syscall emulation seem to work OK.
> There is a problem with ps_strings / argv[0] being NULL in crt0.o.
> (looks like it would not be hard to fix)
Yeah, ps_strings rings a bell, I think that was what I was seein
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 21:53:30 +0900
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 March 2015 at 21:37, Tobias Nygren wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:27:27 +0900
> > Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> Does NetBSD have a big stack of out-of-tree patches for QEMU,
> >> or do you run basically stock upstream QEMU?
> >
> > Hi,
On 8 March 2015 at 21:37, Tobias Nygren wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:27:27 +0900
> Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Does NetBSD have a big stack of out-of-tree patches for QEMU,
>> or do you run basically stock upstream QEMU?
>
> Hi, it is more or less stock except for this patch.
Cool. (I know the Fre
Hello,
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 19:27:27 +0900
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 March 2015 at 06:37, Tobias Nygren wrote:
> > A couple of #ifdef changes necessary to use NetBSD's ucontext
> > structs on sparc64 and arm.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tobias Nygren
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell
>
> Does NetBS
On 6 March 2015 at 06:37, Tobias Nygren wrote:
> A couple of #ifdef changes necessary to use NetBSD's ucontext
> structs on sparc64 and arm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Nygren
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell
Does NetBSD have a big stack of out-of-tree patches for QEMU,
or do you run basically stock u
A couple of #ifdef changes necessary to use NetBSD's ucontext
structs on sparc64 and arm.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Nygren
---
user-exec.c | 16 +++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/user-exec.c b/user-exec.c
index 1ff8673..8f57e8a 100644
--- a/user-exec.c
++
