在 2013-04-09二的 17:20 +0800，陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)写道：
> Hi liguang,
>
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:21:10PM +0800, li guang wrote:
> > 在 2013-04-09二的 10:11 +0200，Paolo Bonzini写道：
> > > Il 09/04/2013 10:05, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) ha scritto:
> > > > Hi liguang,
> > > >
> > > > Just to be curious, how much
在 2013-04-10三的 10:58 +0800，陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)写道：
> > you're right, seems the word 'optimize' is not good here.
> > but what should I use?
> > you know, even compiler like gcc will use -O for code optimization.
>
> "translate: code cleanup in gen_intermediate_code_internal" would be
> better, I t
> you're right, seems the word 'optimize' is not good here.
> but what should I use?
> you know, even compiler like gcc will use -O for code optimization.
"translate: code cleanup in gen_intermediate_code_internal" would be
better, I think. :)
Regards,
chenwj
--
Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
Computer Sy
在 2013-04-10三的 10:31 +0800，陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)写道：
> Hi liguang,
>
> > OK, thanks!
> > but, please make no mistake,
> > I'm not saying this patch promote performance of TCG,
> > this just optimize code writing of this function, of
> > course code writing is not deemed to promote its performance.
> >
Hi liguang,
> OK, thanks!
> but, please make no mistake,
> I'm not saying this patch promote performance of TCG,
> this just optimize code writing of this function, of
> course code writing is not deemed to promote its performance.
> or, we shouldn't do any code change if they benefit little
> in
在 2013-04-09二的 10:08 +0100，Peter Maydell写道：
> On 9 April 2013 09:21, li guang wrote:
> > 在 2013-04-09二的 10:11 +0200，Paolo Bonzini写道：
> >> Il 09/04/2013 10:05, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) ha scritto:
> >> > Hi liguang,
> >> >
> >> > Just to be curious, how much performance improvement this patch can
> >>
Hi liguang,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:21:10PM +0800, li guang wrote:
> 在 2013-04-09二的 10:11 +0200，Paolo Bonzini写道：
> > Il 09/04/2013 10:05, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) ha scritto:
> > > Hi liguang,
> > >
> > > Just to be curious, how much performance improvement this patch can get?
> >
> > I think zer
On 9 April 2013 09:21, li guang wrote:
> 在 2013-04-09二的 10:11 +0200，Paolo Bonzini写道：
>> Il 09/04/2013 10:05, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) ha scritto:
>> > Hi liguang,
>> >
>> > Just to be curious, how much performance improvement this patch can get?
>>
>> I think zero. It is indeed making the code a tiny
在 2013-04-09二的 10:11 +0200，Paolo Bonzini写道：
> Il 09/04/2013 10:05, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) ha scritto:
> > Hi liguang,
> >
> > Just to be curious, how much performance improvement this patch can get?
>
> I think zero. It is indeed making the code a tiny bit more readable in
> the 2nd/3rd/5th/6th hu
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:11:37AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 09/04/2013 10:05, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) ha scritto:
> > Hi liguang,
> >
> > Just to be curious, how much performance improvement this patch can get?
>
> I think zero. It is indeed making the code a tiny bit more readable in
> the
Il 09/04/2013 10:05, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) ha scritto:
> Hi liguang,
>
> Just to be curious, how much performance improvement this patch can get?
I think zero. It is indeed making the code a tiny bit more readable in
the 2nd/3rd/5th/6th hunks.
But the 1st and 4th hunks, which do
-num_insns
Hi liguang,
Just to be curious, how much performance improvement this patch can get?
Regards,
chenwj
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:45:39AM +0800, liguang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: liguang
> ---
> target-arm/translate.c | 17 -
> target-i386/translate.c | 17 -
Signed-off-by: liguang
---
target-arm/translate.c | 17 -
target-i386/translate.c | 17 -
target-mips/translate.c | 16
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-arm/translate.c b/target-arm/translate.c
index 35
13 matches
Mail list logo
