On 11/27/2016 11:53 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> tcg_gen_andi_i32(tmp, tmp, 31);
>> > mask = tcg_const_i32(0x7fffu);
>> > tcg_gen_shr_i32(mask, mask, tmp);
>> > +if (!TCGV_IS_UNUSED(tlen)) {
>> > +tcg_gen_mov_i32(tlen, tmp);
> W
Le 15/11/2016 à 21:44, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> diff --git a/target-m68k/translate.c b/target-m68k/translate.c
> index bc6ec39..ed40ade 100644
> --- a/target-m68k/translate.c
> +++ b/target-m68k/translate.c
> @@ -3913,7 +3913,14 @@ DISAS_INSN(bfop_reg)
>
On Nov 15 2016, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 11/15/2016 10:12 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 15/11/2016 à 22:07, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
>>> Le 15/11/2016 à 21:44, Richard Henderson a écrit :
@@ -5415,6 +5450,8 @@ void register_m68k_insns (CPUM68KState *env)
INSN(bfop_reg, eac0,
Le 15/11/2016 à 22:21, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> On 11/15/2016 10:07 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 15/11/2016 à 21:44, Richard Henderson a écrit :
>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I've started a glibc test run with this, but I don't expect overmuch.
>>> The only applicati
On 11/15/2016 10:07 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 15/11/2016 à 21:44, Richard Henderson a écrit :
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
I've started a glibc test run with this, but I don't expect overmuch.
The only applications I can see are "bfffo *,0,32,dN" which isn't
exactly exhaustive. Pro
On 11/15/2016 10:12 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 15/11/2016 à 22:07, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
Le 15/11/2016 à 21:44, Richard Henderson a écrit :
@@ -5415,6 +5450,8 @@ void register_m68k_insns (CPUM68KState *env)
INSN(bfop_reg, eac0, fff8, BITFIELD); /* bfchg */
INSN(bfop_mem, ecc0,
Le 15/11/2016 à 22:07, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
> Le 15/11/2016 à 21:44, Richard Henderson a écrit :
>> @@ -5415,6 +5450,8 @@ void register_m68k_insns (CPUM68KState *env)
>> INSN(bfop_reg, eac0, fff8, BITFIELD); /* bfchg */
>> INSN(bfop_mem, ecc0, ffc0, BITFIELD); /* bfclr */
>>
Le 15/11/2016 à 21:44, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
>
> I've started a glibc test run with this, but I don't expect overmuch.
> The only applications I can see are "bfffo *,0,32,dN" which isn't
> exactly exhaustive. Probably better to hand craft some tests
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
I've started a glibc test run with this, but I don't expect overmuch.
The only applications I can see are "bfffo *,0,32,dN" which isn't
exactly exhaustive. Probably better to hand craft some tests vs real
hardware.
Considering the prevelance of small helper
