On 23 December 2013 14:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> OK, ack my patch then? I'll add a comment
> /* TODO: remove when we support more CPUs. */
Post an updated patch (with TODO comments in both
places) and I'll ack it.
thanks
-- PMM
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:37:41PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 December 2013 11:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > commit 5ce4f35781028ce1aee3341e6002f925fdc7aaf3
> > "target-arm: A64: add set_pc cpu method"
> >
> > introduces an array aarch64_cpus which is zero
> > size if this code is
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 01:41:50PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 December 2013 13:32, Stefan Weil wrote:
> > Am 23.12.2013 13:59, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> >> On 23 December 2013 12:50, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>> Il 23/12/2013 13:37, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> At a minimum, if we take
On 23 December 2013 13:45, Andreas Färber wrote:
> While I share your sentiment wrt this workaround, what's the status of
> getting a real 64-bit CPU applied? Isn't the Cortex-A57/A53 CPU
> independent of whether we have all MPCore etc. pieces in place? That
> would seem the most elegant solution
Am 23.12.2013 13:37, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 23 December 2013 11:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> commit 5ce4f35781028ce1aee3341e6002f925fdc7aaf3
>> "target-arm: A64: add set_pc cpu method"
>>
>> introduces an array aarch64_cpus which is zero
>> size if this code is built without CONFIG_US
On 23 December 2013 13:32, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 23.12.2013 13:59, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 23 December 2013 12:50, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 23/12/2013 13:37, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
At a minimum, if we take this approach we should add TODO comments
to the effect that the NUL
Am 23.12.2013 13:59, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 23 December 2013 12:50, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 23/12/2013 13:37, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>>> At a minimum, if we take this approach we should add TODO comments
>>> to the effect that the NULL terminator and the if() can be removed
>>> when the
On 23 December 2013 12:50, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 23/12/2013 13:37, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> At a minimum, if we take this approach we should add TODO comments
>> to the effect that the NULL terminator and the if() can be removed
>> when the first real AArch64 CPU is added.
>>
>> I think I'
Il 23/12/2013 13:37, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> At a minimum, if we take this approach we should add TODO comments
> to the effect that the NULL terminator and the if() can be removed
> when the first real AArch64 CPU is added.
>
> I think I'd rather put the if (!info->name) continue into the fun
On 23 December 2013 11:56, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> commit 5ce4f35781028ce1aee3341e6002f925fdc7aaf3
> "target-arm: A64: add set_pc cpu method"
>
> introduces an array aarch64_cpus which is zero
> size if this code is built without CONFIG_USER_ONLY.
> In particular an attempt to iterate over
commit 5ce4f35781028ce1aee3341e6002f925fdc7aaf3
"target-arm: A64: add set_pc cpu method"
introduces an array aarch64_cpus which is zero
size if this code is built without CONFIG_USER_ONLY.
In particular an attempt to iterate over this array produces a warning:
CCaarch64-softmmu/target-ar
11 matches
Mail list logo
