On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 01/02/13 16:56, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:07:16PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> The spice_server pointer is a global variable and
>>> vm_change_state_handler() therefore does not use its opaque parameter.
>>>
On 01/02/13 16:56, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:07:16PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> The spice_server pointer is a global variable and
>> vm_change_state_handler() therefore does not use its opaque parameter.
>>
>> The vm change state handler is added with a pointer to th
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:07:16PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The spice_server pointer is a global variable and
> vm_change_state_handler() therefore does not use its opaque parameter.
>
> The vm change state handler is added with a pointer to the spice_server
> pointer. This is useless and
On 12/19/2012 03:07 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
The spice_server pointer is a global variable and
... is a static variable in ui/spice-core.c and
vm_change_state_handler() therefore does not use its opaque parameter.
The vm change state handler is added with a pointer to the spice_server
poin
The spice_server pointer is a global variable and
vm_change_state_handler() therefore does not use its opaque parameter.
The vm change state handler is added with a pointer to the spice_server
pointer. This is useless and we probably would not want 2 levels of
pointers.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Haj
