> Am 04.05.2014 um 12:28 schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy :
>
>> On 04/29/2014 07:40 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>> On 29.04.14 05:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> Recently a check for maximum supported MSIX vectors number has been
>>> added. However the check always assumed that MSIX is the o
On 04/29/2014 07:40 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 29.04.14 05:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> Recently a check for maximum supported MSIX vectors number has been
>> added. However the check always assumed that MSIX is the only case
>> and failed on devices which have MSI but do not have MSIX
On 29.04.14 05:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Recently a check for maximum supported MSIX vectors number has been
added. However the check always assumed that MSIX is the only case
and failed on devices which have MSI but do not have MSIX such as
QEMU's PCI Bridge. This results in assert in xic
Recently a check for maximum supported MSIX vectors number has been
added. However the check always assumed that MSIX is the only case
and failed on devices which have MSI but do not have MSIX such as
QEMU's PCI Bridge. This results in assert in xics_alloc_block() as
req_num is zero.
This adds a c
