Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: make sure RMA is in first mode of first memory node

2013-11-04 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 00:11 +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > Question about english - is "the single RMA" equal to "the only RMA"? Yes. Ben.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: make sure RMA is in first mode of first memory node

2013-11-04 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 11/05/2013 12:19 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 4 November 2013 13:11, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> PAPR says in "Hypervisor Call Functions": >> >> "Logical addresses start at zero. When control is initially passed to the >> OS from the platform, the first region is the >> single RMA. The firs

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: make sure RMA is in first mode of first memory node

2013-11-04 Thread Peter Maydell
On 4 November 2013 13:11, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > PAPR says in "Hypervisor Call Functions": > > "Logical addresses start at zero. When control is initially passed to the > OS from the platform, the first region is the > single RMA. The first region has logical region identifier of zero. This

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: make sure RMA is in first mode of first memory node

2013-11-04 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 11/04/2013 10:50 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:28:12 +0100 > Alexander Graf wrote: > >> >> On 04.11.2013, at 11:55, Benjamin Herrenschmidt >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 11:44 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: On 01.11.2013, at 11:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: make sure RMA is in first mode of first memory node

2013-11-04 Thread Thomas Huth
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:28:12 +0100 Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 04.11.2013, at 11:55, Benjamin Herrenschmidt > wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 11:44 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> On 01.11.2013, at 11:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > >> > >>> SLOF gets really confused if RTAS/device-t

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: make sure RMA is in first mode of first memory node

2013-11-04 Thread Alexander Graf
On 04.11.2013, at 11:55, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 11:44 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 01.11.2013, at 11:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> >>> SLOF gets really confused if RTAS/device-tree and everything else >>> what SLOF can use is not in the very first blo

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: make sure RMA is in first mode of first memory node

2013-11-04 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 11:44 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 01.11.2013, at 11:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > > > SLOF gets really confused if RTAS/device-tree and everything else > > what SLOF can use is not in the very first block of the very first > > memory node. > > > > This makes sure

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: make sure RMA is in first mode of first memory node

2013-11-04 Thread Alexander Graf
On 01.11.2013, at 11:21, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > SLOF gets really confused if RTAS/device-tree and everything else > what SLOF can use is not in the very first block of the very first > memory node. > > This makes sure that the RMA area is where SLOF expects it to be. > > Cc: Benjamin He

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr: make sure RMA is in first mode of first memory node

2013-11-01 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
SLOF gets really confused if RTAS/device-tree and everything else what SLOF can use is not in the very first block of the very first memory node. This makes sure that the RMA area is where SLOF expects it to be. Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Nikunj A Dadhania Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevski