On 1/28/19 12:25 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 11:22, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> wrote:
>> On 1/27/19 12:37 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>>> Did you try using G_STATIC_ASSERT* instead?
>> [...]
>>
>> Is there a same plan for QEMU codebase?
>
> Our version uses _Static_assert wh
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 11:22, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 1/27/19 12:37 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Did you try using G_STATIC_ASSERT* instead?
> [...]
>
> Is there a same plan for QEMU codebase?
Our version uses _Static_assert where possible, which I think
will give better error mess
Hi Marc-André,
On 1/27/19 12:37 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 5:55 AM Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
>>
>> (Which I'll fold as appropriate within Marc-André's patch series)
>
> Did you try using G_STATIC_ASSERT* instead?
[...]
Is there a same plan for QEMU codebase?
Marc-André Lureau, le dim. 27 janv. 2019 15:37:38 +0400, a ecrit:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 5:55 AM Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> >
> > (Which I'll fold as appropriate within Marc-André's patch series)
>
> Did you try using G_STATIC_ASSERT* instead?
Ah, right, that can be used instead, sent refine
Hi
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 5:55 AM Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> (Which I'll fold as appropriate within Marc-André's patch series)
Did you try using G_STATIC_ASSERT* instead?
looks good otherwise
>
> Samuel Thibault, le dim. 27 janv. 2019 02:51:13 +0100, a ecrit:
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibaul
(Which I'll fold as appropriate within Marc-André's patch series)
Samuel Thibault, le dim. 27 janv. 2019 02:51:13 +0100, a ecrit:
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
> ---
> slirp/ip.h | 6 --
> slirp/ip6.h | 6 --
> slirp/ip6_icmp.h | 12 +++-
> slirp/util.h | 25 +
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
---
slirp/ip.h | 6 --
slirp/ip6.h | 6 --
slirp/ip6_icmp.h | 12 +++-
slirp/util.h | 25 +
4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/slirp/ip.h b/slirp/ip.h
index 2baeeb9a3a..77182e61a9
