On 2011-09-27 12:56, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
> On 27/09/2011 11:20, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>
>> The two new variables "arp_requested" and "expiration_date" in the mbuf
>> structure have been added after the variable-sized "m_dat_" array. The
>> variables have to be added before the m_dat_ array instead
On 27/09/2011 11:20, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> The two new variables "arp_requested" and "expiration_date" in the mbuf
> structure have been added after the variable-sized "m_dat_" array. The
> variables have to be added before the m_dat_ array instead.
> Without this patch, the expiration_date gets
On 2011-09-27 11:20, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> The two new variables "arp_requested" and "expiration_date" in the mbuf
> structure have been added after the variable-sized "m_dat_" array. The
> variables have to be added before the m_dat_ array instead.
> Without this patch, the expiration_date gets
The two new variables "arp_requested" and "expiration_date" in the mbuf
structure have been added after the variable-sized "m_dat_" array. The
variables have to be added before the m_dat_ array instead.
Without this patch, the expiration_date gets clobbered by code that
accesses the m_dat_ array.