Am 24.01.2012 16:25, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
On 2012-01-24 16:22, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/24/2012 01:53 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Now that we have a hard dependency on python anyway, we can replace the
slow shell script to calculate the option ROM checksum with a fast AND
portable python version. Teste
Jan Kiszka writes:
> On 2012-01-24 16:22, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 01/24/2012 01:53 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Now that we have a hard dependency on python anyway, we can replace the
>>> slow shell script to calculate the option ROM checksum with a fast AND
>>> portable python version. Tested both
On 2012-01-24 16:22, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/24/2012 01:53 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Now that we have a hard dependency on python anyway, we can replace the
>> slow shell script to calculate the option ROM checksum with a fast AND
>> portable python version. Tested both with python 2.7 and 3.1.
>>
On 01/24/2012 01:53 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Now that we have a hard dependency on python anyway, we can replace the
> slow shell script to calculate the option ROM checksum with a fast AND
> portable python version. Tested both with python 2.7 and 3.1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
> ---
>
> +++
Now that we have a hard dependency on python anyway, we can replace the
slow shell script to calculate the option ROM checksum with a fast AND
portable python version. Tested both with python 2.7 and 3.1.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
---
Getting v2 vs. v3 running wasn't straightforward, but a pytho
