Am 08.04.2013 14:52, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 26 March 2013 14:35, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 26.03.2013 13:20, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> Commit b350ab75 causes segfaults on accesses to PVR/PRR/CVR because
>>> it tries to call SUPERH_CPU_GET_CLASS() on a pointer that isn't a
>>> QOM object. F
On 26 March 2013 14:35, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 26.03.2013 13:20, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> Commit b350ab75 causes segfaults on accesses to PVR/PRR/CVR because
>> it tries to call SUPERH_CPU_GET_CLASS() on a pointer that isn't a
>> QOM object. Fix this by getting the actual QOM CPU object first
On 26 March 2013 14:35, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 26.03.2013 13:20, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> Commit b350ab75 causes segfaults on accesses to PVR/PRR/CVR because
>> it tries to call SUPERH_CPU_GET_CLASS() on a pointer that isn't a
>> QOM object. Fix this by getting the actual QOM CPU object first
Am 26.03.2013 13:20, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> Commit b350ab75 causes segfaults on accesses to PVR/PRR/CVR because
> it tries to call SUPERH_CPU_GET_CLASS() on a pointer that isn't a
> QOM object. Fix this by getting the actual QOM CPU object first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
> ---
> Tested
Commit b350ab75 causes segfaults on accesses to PVR/PRR/CVR because
it tries to call SUPERH_CPU_GET_CLASS() on a pointer that isn't a
QOM object. Fix this by getting the actual QOM CPU object first.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell
---
Tested with the r2d image/instructions from
https://oss.renesas.c
