On 09/03/2013 04:05 PM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
On 09/03/2013 03:02 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
On 08/30/2013 10:21 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
On 08/29/2013 05:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Now there's a second whitelist, right bef
On Tuesday, September 03, 2013 05:07:53 PM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 03:21 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 03, 2013 02:08:28 PM Corey Bryant wrote:
> >> On 09/03/2013 02:02 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
> >>> On 08/30/2013 10:21 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 05:
On 09/03/2013 03:21 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 03, 2013 02:08:28 PM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 09/03/2013 02:02 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
On 08/30/2013 10:21 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
On 08/29/2013 05:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo
On 09/03/2013 03:02 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
On 08/30/2013 10:21 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
On 08/29/2013 05:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The
second
whitelist is the
On 09/03/2013 02:21 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Tuesday, September 03, 2013 02:08:28 PM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 09/03/2013 02:02 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
On 08/30/2013 10:21 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
On 08/29/2013 05:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo
On 09/03/2013 02:02 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
On 08/30/2013 10:21 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
On 08/29/2013 05:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The
second
whitelist is the
On Tuesday, September 03, 2013 02:08:28 PM Corey Bryant wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 02:02 PM, Corey Bryant wrote:
> > On 08/30/2013 10:21 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> >> On 08/29/2013 05:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> Now there's a
On 08/30/2013 10:21 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
On 08/29/2013 05:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The second
whitelist is the same as the first one, except for exec() and s
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:42:34AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Friday, August 30, 2013 05:23:45 PM Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Eduardo Otubo
> wrote:
> > > On 08/29/2013 05:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otu
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 05:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
>>>
>>> Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The second
>>> whitelist is the same as the first one, exce
On Friday, August 30, 2013 11:27:28 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 09:56 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:04:32 PM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> >> Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The second
> >> whitelist is the same as the first one, excep
On Friday, August 30, 2013 05:23:45 PM Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Eduardo Otubo
wrote:
> > On 08/29/2013 05:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> >>> Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu
On 08/29/2013 09:56 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:04:32 PM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The second
whitelist is the same as the first one, except for exec() and select().
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo
We talked a
On 08/29/2013 05:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 29/08/2013 10:34, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The second
whitelist is the same as the first one, except for exec() and s
On 08/29/2013 05:34 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The second
whitelist is the same as the first one, except for exec() and select().
-netdev tap,downscript=/path/to/scrip
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:04:32 PM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The second
> whitelist is the same as the first one, except for exec() and select().
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo
We talked about this in a previous thread, but as a
Il 29/08/2013 10:34, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
>> Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The second
>> whitelist is the same as the first one, except for exec() and select().
>
> -netdev tap,downscript=/path/
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:04:32PM -0300, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
> Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The second
> whitelist is the same as the first one, except for exec() and select().
-netdev tap,downscript=/path/to/script requires exec() in the QEMU
shutdown code path.
Now there's a second whitelist, right before the vcpu starts. The second
whitelist is the same as the first one, except for exec() and select().
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo
---
The second whitelist is installed right before the vcpu starts, it contains all
the system calls the first one has exce
19 matches
Mail list logo
