Blue Swirl writes:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 17.01.2013 21:13, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Tell me what you consider the "correct" tab width for readers and I'll
find a piece of QEMU code that was
Am 25.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Blue Swirl:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 17.01.2013 21:13, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Tell me what you consider the "correct" tab width for readers and I'll
find a piece o
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 17.01.2013 21:13, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> Tell me what you consider the "correct" tab width for readers and I'll
>>> find a piece of QEMU code that was authored for a different t
Am 17.01.2013 21:13, schrieb Blue Swirl:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> Tell me what you consider the "correct" tab width for readers and I'll
>> find a piece of QEMU code that was authored for a different tab width
>> :).
>
> 8.
So FWIW one exception is target-cris
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 09:04:57AM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:13:38PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 09:04:57AM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:13:38PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:46:18AM +
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:13:38PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:46:18AM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Stefan Hajnocz
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:13:38PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:46:18AM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:43:51PM +
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:46:18AM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:43:51PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:46:18AM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:43:51PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:38:39PM -0500, Nicko
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:43:51PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:38:39PM -0500, Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
>> >> memcpy() for overlapping regions is undef
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 08:43:51PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:38:39PM -0500, Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
> >> memcpy() for overlapping regions is undefined behavior; use memmove()
> >> instead in readline_hist_add(
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:38:39PM -0500, Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
>> memcpy() for overlapping regions is undefined behavior; use memmove()
>> instead in readline_hist_add().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nickolai Zeldovich
>> ---
>> readline.c |
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:38:39PM -0500, Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
> memcpy() for overlapping regions is undefined behavior; use memmove()
> instead in readline_hist_add().
>
> Signed-off-by: Nickolai Zeldovich
> ---
> readline.c |4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I
On 01/07/2013 12:38 PM, Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
> memcpy() for overlapping regions is undefined behavior; use memmove()
> instead in readline_hist_add().
>
> Signed-off-by: Nickolai Zeldovich
> ---
> readline.c |4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This probably shoul
memcpy() for overlapping regions is undefined behavior; use memmove()
instead in readline_hist_add().
Signed-off-by: Nickolai Zeldovich
---
readline.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/readline.c b/readline.c
index 5fc9643..aeccc7b 100644
--- a/readline.c
16 matches
Mail list logo