On 07/13/2016 07:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 13/07/2016 13:40, Cao jin wrote:
On 07/13/2016 06:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 13/07/2016 11:06, Cao jin wrote:
When passed argument 'ns' is 0, macro DIV_ROUND_UP will return 0 also.
It's potentially slower though.
Is it because th
On 13/07/2016 13:40, Cao jin wrote:
>
>
> On 07/13/2016 06:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13/07/2016 11:06, Cao jin wrote:
>>> When passed argument 'ns' is 0, macro DIV_ROUND_UP will return 0 also.
>>
>> It's potentially slower though.
>>
>
> Is it because the function in the i/o loop
On 07/13/2016 06:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 13/07/2016 11:06, Cao jin wrote:
When passed argument 'ns' is 0, macro DIV_ROUND_UP will return 0 also.
It's potentially slower though.
Is it because the function in the i/o loop path, so the potentially
extra arithmetical instructions ma
On 13/07/2016 11:06, Cao jin wrote:
> When passed argument 'ns' is 0, macro DIV_ROUND_UP will return 0 also.
It's potentially slower though.
Paolo
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin
> ---
> qemu-timer.c | 6 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a
When passed argument 'ns' is 0, macro DIV_ROUND_UP will return 0 also.
Cc: Paolo Bonzini
Signed-off-by: Cao jin
---
qemu-timer.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qemu-timer.c b/qemu-timer.c
index eb22e92..cfe0893 100644
--- a/qemu-timer.c
+++ b/qemu-timer
