> > I have submit a patch into upstream's KVM for supporting
> these features before, and the patch has been applied in kvm-git.
>
> As far as I can see, nothing has been applied to any tree, neither
> qemu.git nor qemu-kvm.git.
Sorry, I have submit to kvm.git, not qemu.git or qemu-kvm.git.
> >
On 2011-05-06 11:37, brill...@viatech.com.cn wrote:
>
>>>
>>> If I want to submit a patch for the qemu-kvm-git, should I
>> use "[QEMU-DEVEL][Patch]..." as the subject? Or there are other rules
>> for qemu-kvm upstream? If yes, would you like to tell me?. Thanks!
>>
>> If you really have to tar
> >
> > If I want to submit a patch for the qemu-kvm-git, should I
> use "[QEMU-DEVEL][Patch]..." as the subject? Or there are other rules
> for qemu-kvm upstream? If yes, would you like to tell me?. Thanks!
>
> If you really have to target qemu-kvm only, then you tagging is fine.
> But this
On 2011-05-06 03:06, brill...@viatech.com.cn wrote:
> Hi, Jan
> Thank you very much for your advice. That's helpful for me.
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the subject's tag (qemu-kvm) is misleading. This is actually targeting
>> the uq/master patch queue, i.e. the upstream kvm staging area.
>>
>
> If I want
Hi, Jan
Thank you very much for your advice. That's helpful for me.
> Hi,
>
> the subject's tag (qemu-kvm) is misleading. This is actually targeting
> the uq/master patch queue, i.e. the upstream kvm staging area.
>
If I want to submit a patch for the qemu-kvm-git, should I use
"[QEMU-D
Hi,
the subject's tag (qemu-kvm) is misleading. This is actually targeting
the uq/master patch queue, i.e. the upstream kvm staging area.
On 2011-05-05 05:03, brill...@viatech.com.cn wrote:
> When KVM is running on VIA CPU with host cpu's model, the feautures of
> VIA CPU will be passed into kvm
When KVM is running on VIA CPU with host cpu's model, the feautures of
VIA CPU will be passed into kvm guest by calling the CPUID instruction
for Centaur.
Signed-off-by: BrillyWu
Signed-off-by: KaryJin
---
target-i386/cpu.h |7 +++
target-i386/cpuid.c | 48
