On Mon 10 Sep 2018 05:55:15 PM CEST, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Hm, it actually doesn't crash for me even without the fix. Anyway, I
>> don't have a good idea to make it more likely to crash and it's
>> certainly better than nothing.
>
> Does running the test under valgrind reliably see the use-after-fre
On 9/10/18 4:57 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 10.09.2018 um 11:29 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
We just fixed a bug that was causing a use-after-free when QEMU was
unable to create a temporary snapshot. This is a test case for this
scenario.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia
Hm, it actually doesn't
On Mon 10 Sep 2018 11:57:48 AM CEST, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 10.09.2018 um 11:29 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
>> We just fixed a bug that was causing a use-after-free when QEMU was
>> unable to create a temporary snapshot. This is a test case for this
>> scenario.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alberto Ga
Am 10.09.2018 um 11:29 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> We just fixed a bug that was causing a use-after-free when QEMU was
> unable to create a temporary snapshot. This is a test case for this
> scenario.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia
Hm, it actually doesn't crash for me even without the f
We just fixed a bug that was causing a use-after-free when QEMU was
unable to create a temporary snapshot. This is a test case for this
scenario.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia
---
tests/qemu-iotests/051| 3 +++
tests/qemu-iotests/051.out| 3 +++
tests/qemu-iotests/051.pc.out | 3 +++
