On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 07:17:07PM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 03:46:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 28/02/2014 20:14, Gabriel L. Somlo ha scritto:
> > >Some guests (e.g. 0S X) insist on a minimum lapic version of 0x14.
> > >This patch bumps the emulated lapic v
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 04:31:12PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 09:56:50AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 02/03/2014 01:17, Gabriel L. Somlo ha scritto:
> > >Although, on KVM, it's simply hardcoded to 0x14 rather than exposing to
> > >the guest whatever the host CP
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 09:56:50AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 02/03/2014 01:17, Gabriel L. Somlo ha scritto:
> >Although, on KVM, it's simply hardcoded to 0x14 rather than exposing to
> >the guest whatever the host CPU's apic version happens to be, or
> >trying to match it to the CPU model:
>
Il 02/03/2014 01:17, Gabriel L. Somlo ha scritto:
Although, on KVM, it's simply hardcoded to 0x14 rather than exposing to
the guest whatever the host CPU's apic version happens to be, or
trying to match it to the CPU model:
[somlo@foober kvm]$ grep -i version arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
...
/* 14 is t
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 03:46:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 28/02/2014 20:14, Gabriel L. Somlo ha scritto:
> >Some guests (e.g. 0S X) insist on a minimum lapic version of 0x14.
> >This patch bumps the emulated lapic version to 0x14 to accomodate that.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Gabriel L. Somlo
Il 28/02/2014 20:14, Gabriel L. Somlo ha scritto:
Some guests (e.g. 0S X) insist on a minimum lapic version of 0x14.
This patch bumps the emulated lapic version to 0x14 to accomodate that.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel L. Somlo
---
Along with the TCG ioapic polarity fix, this allows me to boot OS X
w
Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 11:44:33AM +0800, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>> Deja vu :). Should we really set this to thd least compatible version or
>> rather to a current one that resembles roughly what we support? Otherwise
>> patches like this will come up for every new o
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 11:44:33AM +0800, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Deja vu :). Should we really set this to thd least compatible version or
> rather to a current one that resembles roughly what we support? Otherwise
> patches like this will come up for every new osx release.
>
> What is the versi
> Am 01.03.2014 um 03:14 schrieb "Gabriel L. Somlo" :
>
> Some guests (e.g. 0S X) insist on a minimum lapic version of 0x14.
> This patch bumps the emulated lapic version to 0x14 to accomodate that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel L. Somlo
> ---
>
> Along with the TCG ioapic polarity fix, this all
Some guests (e.g. 0S X) insist on a minimum lapic version of 0x14.
This patch bumps the emulated lapic version to 0x14 to accomodate that.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel L. Somlo
---
Along with the TCG ioapic polarity fix, this allows me to boot OS X
without KVM acceleration.
I dug around the Intel doc
10 matches
Mail list logo
