Am 12.10.2016 um 03:14 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> On Wed, 09/28 15:04, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Handling this is similar to what is done to the L2 entry in the case of
> > compressed clusters.
>
> Kevin, Max, is there anything else I need to do before this patch can be
> applied?
Hm, actually, it l
On Wed, 09/28 15:04, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Handling this is similar to what is done to the L2 entry in the case of
> compressed clusters.
Kevin, Max, is there anything else I need to do before this patch can be
applied?
Fam
On 29.09.2016 10:10, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, 09/29 09:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 29/09/2016 04:21, Fam Zheng wrote:
>>> On Wed, 09/28 18:11, Max Reitz wrote:
Note that BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP does not mean "Yes, please discard" but
just "You may discard if it's easier for you". Bu
Am 30.09.2016 um 04:04 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> On Thu, 09/29 12:39, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 29.09.2016 um 11:55 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > > On Thu, 09/29 11:29, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > Am 28.09.2016 um 09:04 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > > > > Handling this is similar to what is done
On Thu, 09/29 12:39, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 29.09.2016 um 11:55 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > On Thu, 09/29 11:29, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 28.09.2016 um 09:04 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > > > Handling this is similar to what is done to the L2 entry in the case of
> > > > compressed clusters.
On 29/09/2016 14:50, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 29/09/2016 14:48, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 29.09.2016 um 14:14 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
>>> On 29/09/2016 12:39, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Because there is another check of pass-discard-request value in
>> update_refcount:
>>
>>
On 29/09/2016 14:48, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 29.09.2016 um 14:14 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
>> On 29/09/2016 12:39, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Because there is another check of pass-discard-request value in
> update_refcount:
>
> if (refcount == 0 && s->discard_passthrough[typ
Am 29.09.2016 um 14:14 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 29/09/2016 12:39, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> > Because there is another check of pass-discard-request value in
> >> > update_refcount:
> >> >
> >> > if (refcount == 0 && s->discard_passthrough[type]) {
> >> > update_refcoun
On 29/09/2016 12:39, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> >
>> > Because there is another check of pass-discard-request value in
>> > update_refcount:
>> >
>> > if (refcount == 0 && s->discard_passthrough[type]) {
>> > update_refcount_discard(bs, cluster_offset, s->cluster_size);
>> >
Am 29.09.2016 um 11:55 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> On Thu, 09/29 11:29, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 28.09.2016 um 09:04 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > > Handling this is similar to what is done to the L2 entry in the case of
> > > compressed clusters.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> > > ---
On Thu, 09/29 11:29, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 28.09.2016 um 09:04 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > Handling this is similar to what is done to the L2 entry in the case of
> > compressed clusters.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> > ---
> > block/qcow2-cluster.c | 9 +
> > block/qcow2.c
Am 28.09.2016 um 09:04 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> Handling this is similar to what is done to the L2 entry in the case of
> compressed clusters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> ---
> block/qcow2-cluster.c | 9 +
> block/qcow2.c | 3 ++-
> block/qcow2.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files
On Thu, 09/29 09:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 29/09/2016 04:21, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Wed, 09/28 18:11, Max Reitz wrote:
> >> Note that BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP does not mean "Yes, please discard" but
> >> just "You may discard if it's easier for you". But it's actually not
> >> easier for us, s
On 29/09/2016 04:21, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 09/28 18:11, Max Reitz wrote:
>> Note that BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP does not mean "Yes, please discard" but
>> just "You may discard if it's easier for you". But it's actually not
>> easier for us, so I don't see why we're doing it.
>>
>> As far as I can
On Wed, 09/28 18:11, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 28.09.2016 09:04, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Handling this is similar to what is done to the L2 entry in the case of
> > compressed clusters.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> > ---
> > block/qcow2-cluster.c | 9 +
> > block/qcow2.c | 3 ++-
>
On 28.09.2016 09:04, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Handling this is similar to what is done to the L2 entry in the case of
> compressed clusters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> ---
> block/qcow2-cluster.c | 9 +
> block/qcow2.c | 3 ++-
> block/qcow2.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 9
Handling this is similar to what is done to the L2 entry in the case of
compressed clusters.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
---
block/qcow2-cluster.c | 9 +
block/qcow2.c | 3 ++-
block/qcow2.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/qcow2-
17 matches
Mail list logo
