On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:04:46AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:52:35PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:35:28 +0800
> > Peter Xu wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:49:47PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > VFIO actually wants to crea
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:52:35PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:35:28 +0800
> Peter Xu wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:49:47PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > VFIO actually wants to create a capability with ID == 0.
> > > This is done to make guest drivers
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:35:28 +0800
Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:49:47PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > VFIO actually wants to create a capability with ID == 0.
> > This is done to make guest drivers skip the given capability.
> > pcie_add_capability then trips up on this cap
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:49:47PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> VFIO actually wants to create a capability with ID == 0.
> This is done to make guest drivers skip the given capability.
> pcie_add_capability then trips up on this capability
> when looking for end of capability list.
>
> To su
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:49:47 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> VFIO actually wants to create a capability with ID == 0.
> This is done to make guest drivers skip the given capability.
> pcie_add_capability then trips up on this capability
> when looking for end of capability list.
>
> To suppo
VFIO actually wants to create a capability with ID == 0.
This is done to make guest drivers skip the given capability.
pcie_add_capability then trips up on this capability
when looking for end of capability list.
To support this use-case, it's easy enough to switch to
e.g. 0x for these com
