On 06/11/2017 06:50 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 2017-06-09 00:26, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Back in qemu 2.5, qemu-nbd was immune to port probes (a transient
>> server would not quit, regardless of how many probe connections
>> came and went, until a connection actually negotiated). But we
>> broke that
On 2017-06-09 00:26, Eric Blake wrote:
> Back in qemu 2.5, qemu-nbd was immune to port probes (a transient
> server would not quit, regardless of how many probe connections
> came and went, until a connection actually negotiated). But we
> broke that in commit ee7d7aa when removing the return valu
adding qemu-stable in cc
On 06/08/2017 05:26 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Back in qemu 2.5, qemu-nbd was immune to port probes (a transient
> server would not quit, regardless of how many probe connections
> came and went, until a connection actually negotiated). But we
> broke that in commit ee7d7aa
On 06/08/2017 05:26 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Back in qemu 2.5, qemu-nbd was immune to port probes (a transient
> server would not quit, regardless of how many probe connections
> came and went, until a connection actually negotiated). But we
> broke that in commit ee7d7aa
> Simple test across two
Back in qemu 2.5, qemu-nbd was immune to port probes (a transient
server would not quit, regardless of how many probe connections
came and went, until a connection actually negotiated). But we
broke that in commit ee7d7aa when removing the return value to
nbd_client_new(), although that patch also