Andreas Färber writes:
> Am 08.04.2013 23:55, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> Applied. Thanks.
>
> I am seeing "main-loop: WARNING: I/O thread spun for 1000 iterations"
> for both check-qtest-i386 and check-qtest-x86_64 now, is that expected?
>
> PMM just recently cleaned up the noisy arm qtest targ
Am 08.04.2013 23:55, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> Applied. Thanks.
I am seeing "main-loop: WARNING: I/O thread spun for 1000 iterations"
for both check-qtest-i386 and check-qtest-x86_64 now, is that expected?
PMM just recently cleaned up the noisy arm qtest target... :(
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Pr
Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Hi Anthony,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> The char-flow refactoring introduced a busy-wait that depended on
> an action from the VCPU thread. However, the VCPU thread could
> never take that action because the busy-wait starved the VCPU thread
> of the BQL because it
Eric Blake writes:
> On 04/05/2013 07:46 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> The char-flow refactoring introduced a busy-wait that depended on
>> an action from the VCPU thread. However, the VCPU thread could
>> never take that action because the busy-wait starved the VCPU thread
>> of the BQL because
Il 05/04/2013 15:46, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
> The char-flow refactoring introduced a busy-wait that depended on
> an action from the VCPU thread. However, the VCPU thread could
> never take that action because the busy-wait starved the VCPU thread
> of the BQL because it never dropped the mut
On 04/05/2013 07:46 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> The char-flow refactoring introduced a busy-wait that depended on
> an action from the VCPU thread. However, the VCPU thread could
> never take that action because the busy-wait starved the VCPU thread
> of the BQL because it never dropped the mutex
The char-flow refactoring introduced a busy-wait that depended on
an action from the VCPU thread. However, the VCPU thread could
never take that action because the busy-wait starved the VCPU thread
of the BQL because it never dropped the mutex while running select.
Paolo doesn't want to drop this
