On 7/7/16, 3:09 PM, "Laurent Vivier" wrote:
>
>
>Le 07/07/2016 à 21:04, Wirth, Allan a écrit :
>>
>>
>> On 7/7/16, 3:02 PM, "Laurent Vivier" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 07/07/2016 à 20:49, Riku Voipio a écrit :
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 09:12:09PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 July
Le 07/07/2016 à 21:04, Wirth, Allan a écrit :
>
>
> On 7/7/16, 3:02 PM, "Laurent Vivier" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Le 07/07/2016 à 20:49, Riku Voipio a écrit :
>>> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 09:12:09PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 2 July 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Sadly, this can
On 7/7/16, 3:02 PM, "Laurent Vivier" wrote:
>
>
>Le 07/07/2016 à 20:49, Riku Voipio a écrit :
>> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 09:12:09PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 2 July 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Sadly, this can't work:
sparc/sparc64/cris use sys_select for NR_sel
Le 07/07/2016 à 20:49, Riku Voipio a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 09:12:09PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 2 July 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> Sadly, this can't work:
>>>
>>> sparc/sparc64/cris use sys_select for NR_select AND NR_newselect.
>>
>>> Not sure all is correct, bu
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 09:12:09PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 July 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > Sadly, this can't work:
> >
> > sparc/sparc64/cris use sys_select for NR_select AND NR_newselect.
>
> > Not sure all is correct, but it's what I've found:
> >
> > | __NR
Le 02/07/2016 à 23:20, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 2 July 2016 at 22:17, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 02/07/2016 à 22:12, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>>> (1) Define neither NR_select nor NR__newselect
>>> (and use pselect6 syscall for select):
>>> aarch64, openrisc, tilegx, unicore32, presumably a
On 2 July 2016 at 22:17, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 02/07/2016 à 22:12, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>> (1) Define neither NR_select nor NR__newselect
>> (and use pselect6 syscall for select):
>> aarch64, openrisc, tilegx, unicore32, presumably any future arch
>
> They use:
>
> kernel/sys.c:
>
> #und
Le 02/07/2016 à 22:12, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 2 July 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Sadly, this can't work:
>>
>> sparc/sparc64/cris use sys_select for NR_select AND NR_newselect.
>
>> Not sure all is correct, but it's what I've found:
>>
>> | __NR_select| __NR__n
On 2 July 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Sadly, this can't work:
>
> sparc/sparc64/cris use sys_select for NR_select AND NR_newselect.
> Not sure all is correct, but it's what I've found:
>
> | __NR_select| __NR__newselect
> ++-+
Le 02/07/2016 à 11:56, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 2 July 2016 at 09:20, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 01/07/2016 à 15:35, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>>> On 1 July 2016 at 12:59, Wirth, Allan wrote:
Linux on X86_64 does not use sel_arg_struct for select(), the args are
passed direct
On 2 July 2016 at 09:20, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>
> Le 01/07/2016 à 15:35, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>> On 1 July 2016 at 12:59, Wirth, Allan wrote:
>>> Linux on X86_64 does not use sel_arg_struct for select(), the args are
>>> passed directly. This patch switches a define so X86_64 uses the corre
Le 01/07/2016 à 15:35, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 1 July 2016 at 12:59, Wirth, Allan wrote:
>> Linux on X86_64 does not use sel_arg_struct for select(), the args are
>> passed directly. This patch switches a define so X86_64 uses the correct
>> calling convention.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Allan Wi
On 1 July 2016 at 16:34, Wirth, Allan wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I didn’t find that patch before when I searched, so
> apologies for the duplicate submission.
>
> The proposed fix certainly does seem cleaner and more general. Does it
> imply though that this patch is incorrect? It fixes the
Thanks for the feedback. I didn’t find that patch before when I searched, so
apologies for the duplicate submission.
The proposed fix certainly does seem cleaner and more general. Does it
imply though that this patch is incorrect? It fixes the emulation bug
in my use case, and AFAICT does not intr
On 1 July 2016 at 12:59, Wirth, Allan wrote:
> Linux on X86_64 does not use sel_arg_struct for select(), the args are
> passed directly. This patch switches a define so X86_64 uses the correct
> calling convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Allan Wirth
> ---
> linux-user/syscall.c | 2 +-
> 1 file chan
Linux on X86_64 does not use sel_arg_struct for select(), the args are
passed directly. This patch switches a define so X86_64 uses the correct
calling convention.
Signed-off-by: Allan Wirth
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/s
16 matches
Mail list logo
