On 01.06.2012, at 04:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 June 2012 02:45, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 01.06.2012, at 03:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 1 June 2012 02:16, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 01.06.2012, at 02:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> So in the multithreaded case do all the thread s
On 1 June 2012 02:45, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 01.06.2012, at 03:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 1 June 2012 02:16, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 01.06.2012, at 02:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
So in the multithreaded case do all the thread stacks live
in this one mapping, or do the non-pri
On 01.06.2012, at 03:39, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 1 June 2012 02:16, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 01.06.2012, at 02:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> So in the multithreaded case do all the thread stacks live
>>> in this one mapping, or do the non-primary thread stacks
>>> live in a standard mmap'd
On 1 June 2012 02:16, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 01.06.2012, at 02:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> So in the multithreaded case do all the thread stacks live
>> in this one mapping, or do the non-primary thread stacks
>> live in a standard mmap'd mapping?
>
> I thought /proc/self/maps always shows the
On 01.06.2012, at 02:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 30 May 2012 13:45, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> When reading our faked /proc/self/maps from a secondary thread,
>> we get an invalid stack entry. This is because ts->stack_base is not
>> initialized in non-primary threads.
>>
>> However, ts->info i
On 30 May 2012 13:45, Alexander Graf wrote:
> When reading our faked /proc/self/maps from a secondary thread,
> we get an invalid stack entry. This is because ts->stack_base is not
> initialized in non-primary threads.
>
> However, ts->info is, and the stack layout information we're looking
> for
When reading our faked /proc/self/maps from a secondary thread,
we get an invalid stack entry. This is because ts->stack_base is not
initialized in non-primary threads.
However, ts->info is, and the stack layout information we're looking
for is there too. So let's use that one instead!
Signed-off
