Hi Peter,
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 July 2013 01:25, Jia Liu wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> Ping?
>>>
>>
>> Thank you, it looks good to me, please push it.
>
> The usual way to say this is to add your r
On 19 July 2013 01:25, Jia Liu wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> Ping?
>>
>
> Thank you, it looks good to me, please push it.
The usual way to say this is to add your reviewed-by
or acked-by tag (depending on how thoroughly you
checked it)...
tha
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Ping?
>
Thank you, it looks good to me, please push it.
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
> On 6 July 2013 21:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> OpenRISC uses the asm-generic versions of target_stat and
>> target_stat64, but it was incorrectly using
Ping?
thanks
-- PMM
On 6 July 2013 21:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> OpenRISC uses the asm-generic versions of target_stat and
> target_stat64, but it was incorrectly using the x86/ARM/etc version
> due to a misplaced defined(TARGET_OPENRISC). The previously unused
> OpenRISC section of the ifdef l
OpenRISC uses the asm-generic versions of target_stat and
target_stat64, but it was incorrectly using the x86/ARM/etc version
due to a misplaced defined(TARGET_OPENRISC). The previously unused
OpenRISC section of the ifdef ladder also defined an incorrect
target_stat and omitted the target_stat64
