On 04/21/17 15:27, gengdongjiu wrote:
> Hi all/Laszlo,
>
> sorry, I have a question to consult with you.
>
>
> On 2017/4/7 2:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 04/06/17 14:35, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>> Dear, Laszlo
>>>Thanks for your detailed explanation.
>>>
>>> On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek w
Hi all/Laszlo,
sorry, I have a question to consult with you.
On 2017/4/7 2:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 04/06/17 14:35, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> Dear, Laszlo
>>Thanks for your detailed explanation.
>>
>> On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> (This ought to be one of the longest address
On 04/07/17 04:52, gengdongjiu wrote:
>
> On 2017/4/7 2:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> I'm unsure if, by "not fixed", you are saying
>>
>> the number of CPER entries that fits in Error Status Data Block N is
>> not *uniform* across 0 <= N <= 10 [1]
>>
>> or
>>
>> the number of CPER entries that
Hi Laszlo,
thanks.
On 2017/4/7 2:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 04/06/17 14:35, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> Dear, Laszlo
>>Thanks for your detailed explanation.
>>
>> On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> (This ought to be one of the longest address lists I've ever seen :)
>>> Thanks for the C
On 04/06/17 14:35, gengdongjiu wrote:
> Dear, Laszlo
>Thanks for your detailed explanation.
>
> On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> (This ought to be one of the longest address lists I've ever seen :)
>> Thanks for the CC. I'm glad Shannon is already on the CC list. For good
>> measure,
Dear, Laszlo
Thanks for your detailed explanation.
On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> (This ought to be one of the longest address lists I've ever seen :)
> Thanks for the CC. I'm glad Shannon is already on the CC list. For good
> measure, I'm adding MST and Igor.)
>
> On 03/29/17 12:36
Hi Christoffer/Laszlo,
On 2017/3/30 1:44, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:37:49PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 03/29/17 16:48, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:51PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta :
>>
> Q
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:37:49PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/29/17 16:48, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:51PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
> >> 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta :
>
> >>> Qemu is essentially fulfilling the role of secure firmware at the
> >>>
Laszlo Ersek writes:
> On 03/29/17 14:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> (8) When QEMU gets SIGBUS from the kernel -- I hope that's going to come
>>> through a signalfd -- QEMU can format the CPER right into guest memory,
>>> and the
Hi Achin,
Thanks for your mail and answer.
2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta :
> Hi gengdongjiu,
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:36:37PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>
>> Hi Laszlo/Biesheuvel/Qemu developer,
>>
>>Now I encounter a issue and want to consult with you in ARM64 platform，
>>
On 03/29/17 16:48, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:51PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
>> 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta :
>>> Qemu is essentially fulfilling the role of secure firmware at the
>>> EL2/EL1 interface (as discussed with Christoffer below). So it
>>> should
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:51PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
> Hi Achin,
> Thanks for your mail and answer.
>
> 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta :
> > Hi gengdongjiu,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:36:37PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Laszlo/Biesheuvel/Qemu developer,
> >>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 03:36:59PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/29/17 14:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> (8) When QEMU gets SIGBUS from the kernel -- I hope that's going to come
> >> through a signalfd -- QEMU can format the
On 03/29/17 14:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> (8) When QEMU gets SIGBUS from the kernel -- I hope that's going to come
>> through a signalfd -- QEMU can format the CPER right into guest memory,
>> and then inject whatever interrupt (
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> (8) When QEMU gets SIGBUS from the kernel -- I hope that's going to come
> through a signalfd -- QEMU can format the CPER right into guest memory,
> and then inject whatever interrupt (or assert whatever GPIO line) is
> necessary for n
Hi Laszlo/Biesheuvel/Qemu developer,
Now I encounter a issue and want to consult with you in ARM64 platform， as
described below:
when guest OS happen synchronous or asynchronous abort, kvm needs to send
the error address to Qemu or UEFI through sigbus to dynamically generate APEI
table.
Hi gengdongjiu,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:36:37PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
>
> Hi Laszlo/Biesheuvel/Qemu developer,
>
>Now I encounter a issue and want to consult with you in ARM64 platform， as
> described below:
>
>when guest OS happen synchronous or asynchronous abort, kvm needs to se
(This ought to be one of the longest address lists I've ever seen :)
Thanks for the CC. I'm glad Shannon is already on the CC list. For good
measure, I'm adding MST and Igor.)
On 03/29/17 12:36, Achin Gupta wrote:
> Hi gengdongjiu,
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:36:37PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:
18 matches
Mail list logo
