On 17/08/2016 14:13, Pino Toscano wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 16:57:42 CEST Pino Toscano wrote:
>> to overcome the limitations of the options handling [1], I'm planning
>> to move more options for iSCSI also as block options, so it is possible
>> to specify them with -drive.
>>
>> The only
On Tuesday, 12 April 2016 16:57:42 CEST Pino Toscano wrote:
> to overcome the limitations of the options handling [1], I'm planning
> to move more options for iSCSI also as block options, so it is possible
> to specify them with -drive.
>
> The only patch in this series is for initiator-target, as
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 04:57:42PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to overcome the limitations of the options handling [1], I'm planning
> to move more options for iSCSI also as block options, so it is possible
> to specify them with -drive.
>
> The only patch in this series is for initiator
Hi,
to overcome the limitations of the options handling [1], I'm planning
to move more options for iSCSI also as block options, so it is possible
to specify them with -drive.
The only patch in this series is for initiator-target, as I want to be
sure the approach is correct, and wanted.
[1] http
