Peter Maydell wrote:
On 26 December 2013 00:22, Li Guang wrote:
Peter Maydell wrote:
On 25 December 2013 07:21, liguang wrote:
This is where your patch should have had an explanation
for why you're making this change. What is the user outside
of hw/sd/ that needs this header that m
On 26 December 2013 00:22, Li Guang wrote:
> Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 25 December 2013 07:21, liguang wrote:
>> This is where your patch should have had an explanation
>> for why you're making this change. What is the user outside
>> of hw/sd/ that needs this header that means we should
>> move
Peter Maydell wrote:
On 25 December 2013 07:21, liguang wrote:
This is where your patch should have had an explanation
for why you're making this change. What is the user outside
of hw/sd/ that needs this header that means we should
move it into include/ ?
I don't mean someone will inclu
On 25 December 2013 07:21, liguang wrote:
This is where your patch should have had an explanation
for why you're making this change. What is the user outside
of hw/sd/ that needs this header that means we should
move it into include/ ?
> Signed-off-by: liguang
thanks
-- PMM
Signed-off-by: liguang
---
hw/sd/sdhci.c |2 +-
hw/sd/sdhci.h | 312
include/hw/sdhci.h | 312
3 files changed, 313 insertions(+), 313 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 hw/sd/s
