On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:44:22PM +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
So it could be tested with linux guests on x86 too I guess?
Can the radeon drm driver handle the devices too?
Yes you can try with x86 guests, I
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:44:22PM +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > > So it could be tested with linux guests on x86 too I guess?
> > > > Can the radeon drm driver handle the devices too?
> > >
> > > Yes you can try with x86 guests, I haven't tested th
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
So it could be tested with linux guests on x86 too I guess?
Can the radeon drm driver handle the devices too?
Yes you can try with x86 guests, I haven't tested that yet. The radeon
driver only supports RV100 and up I think so may only work with the 0x51
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 00:51, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 23:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> I'd have use a pair of extract3
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 23:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
I'd have use a pair of extract32/deposit32 but this is probably easier
By the way, should these lines i
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 23:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 2/11/19 4:19 AM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
This is where my question about valid/impl on mem ops started but I asked
separately again after not get
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
So it could be tested with linux guests on x86 too I guess?
Can the radeon drm driver handle the devices too?
Yes you can try with x86 guests, I haven't tested that yet. The radeon
driver only supports RV100 and up I think so may only work with
Hi,
> > So it could be tested with linux guests on x86 too I guess?
> > Can the radeon drm driver handle the devices too?
>
> Yes you can try with x86 guests, I haven't tested that yet. The radeon
> driver only supports RV100 and up I think so may only work with the 0x5159
> variant not with Ra
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Which linux driver is this?
Those in linux/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/. This ati-vga model defaults to Rage
128 Pro (what PoweMac3,1 has, device id 0x5046) which is handled by the
aty128fb driver under Linux. MIPS fulong2e has Mobility Radeon M6 (RV100,
de
Hi,
> > Which linux driver is this?
>
> Those in linux/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/. This ati-vga model defaults to Rage
> 128 Pro (what PoweMac3,1 has, device id 0x5046) which is handled by the
> aty128fb driver under Linux. MIPS fulong2e has Mobility Radeon M6 (RV100,
> device id 0x5159) that you
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 23:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 2/11/19 4:19 AM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
[...]
+
+static void ati_reg_write_offs(uint32_t *reg, int offs,
+ uint64_t
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:19:14AM +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
At least two machines, the PPC mac99 and MIPS fulong2e, have an ATI
gfx chip by default (Rage 128 Pro and M6/RV100 respectively) and
guests running on these and the PMON2000 firmware of the
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 23:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Hi Zoltan,
>
> Thanks for the quick review and testing. I'll use your suggestions for the
> other (mips) patches in a v2. For this one I'm not convinced.
>
> > On 2/11/19 4:19
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:19:14AM +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> At least two machines, the PPC mac99 and MIPS fulong2e, have an ATI
> gfx chip by default (Rage 128 Pro and M6/RV100 respectively) and
> guests running on these and the PMON2000 firmware of the fulong2e
> expect this to be available.
Hello,
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 12/02/2019 23:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
This looks interesting, however I never received the original via the mailing
list.
Did it get held somewhere because its size?
It appears in the list archives:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/
On 12/02/2019 23:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi Zoltan,
>
> Thanks for the quick review and testing. I'll use your suggestions for the
> other
> (mips) patches in a v2. For this one I'm not convinced.
>
>> On 2/11/19 4:19 AM, BAL
Hello,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Zoltan,
Thanks for the quick review and testing. I'll use your suggestions for the
other (mips) patches in a v2. For this one I'm not convinced.
On 2/11/19 4:19 AM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
[...]
+
+static void ati_reg_write_offs(
Hi Zoltan,
On 2/11/19 4:19 AM, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> At least two machines, the PPC mac99 and MIPS fulong2e, have an ATI
> gfx chip by default (Rage 128 Pro and M6/RV100 respectively) and
> guests running on these and the PMON2000 firmware of the fulong2e
> expect this to be available. Fortunate
At least two machines, the PPC mac99 and MIPS fulong2e, have an ATI
gfx chip by default (Rage 128 Pro and M6/RV100 respectively) and
guests running on these and the PMON2000 firmware of the fulong2e
expect this to be available. Fortunately these are very similar chips
so they can be mostly emulated
19 matches
Mail list logo
