On 11 November 2013 21:12, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> On 11.11.13 22:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> I think I would agree with the commenter in the bug report you
>> reference (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17882)
>> that this is not a clang bug. We shouldn't be relying on the
>> compiler's dead
On 11.11.13 22:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 November 2013 20:10, Andreas Tobler wrote:
>> Paolo asked me to test and submit the below patch to fix compilation and
>> link with clang.
>>
>> Paolo reduced the issue to a clang bug where dead code is not properly
>> eliminated before linktime. (th
On 11 November 2013 20:10, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> Paolo asked me to test and submit the below patch to fix compilation and
> link with clang.
>
> Paolo reduced the issue to a clang bug where dead code is not properly
> eliminated before linktime. (the clang bug ID: 17882)
Thanks for the patch. H
Hello,
Paolo asked me to test and submit the below patch to fix compilation and
link with clang.
Paolo reduced the issue to a clang bug where dead code is not properly
eliminated before linktime. (the clang bug ID: 17882)
Thanks,
Andreas
Signed-off-by: Andreas Tobler
diff --git a/target-i38
