Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: 1522204637-29589-1-git-send-email-zhenwei...@youruncloud.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] file-posix: Support fallocate for block device
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin
On 03/27/2018 09:37 PM, zhenwei.pi wrote:
since linux 4.9, block device supports fallocate. kernel issues
block device zereout request and invalidates page cache. So
ioctl(fd, FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE...) is safer than ioctl(fd,
did you mean fallocate() in the first half of the sentence?
BLKZEROO
since linux 4.9, block device supports fallocate. kernel issues
block device zereout request and invalidates page cache. So
ioctl(fd, FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE...) is safer than ioctl(fd,
BLKZEROOUT...). try to call do_fallocate, if failing, fallback.
use new field "has_fallocate_zero_range" with defau
