On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 05:41:29PM +0400, Maria Kustova wrote:
> The 'refcount_bits' term used in the description of refcount block entry is
> not defined in the specification. The definition is added in the
> 'refcount_order' section where refcount_bits was used as 'width in bits'.
>
> Signed-off
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 07:56:16AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 07:41 AM, Maria Kustova wrote:
>
> > 96 - 99: refcount_order
> > Describes the width of a reference count block entry
> > (width
> > -in bits = 1 << refcount_order). Fo
On 05/23/2014 07:41 AM, Maria Kustova wrote:
> 96 - 99: refcount_order
> Describes the width of a reference count block entry
> (width
> -in bits = 1 << refcount_order). For version 2 images, the
> -order is always assumed t
On 05/23/2014 07:41 AM, Maria Kustova wrote:
> The 'refcount_bits' term used in the description of refcount block entry is
> not defined in the specification. The definition is added in the
> 'refcount_order' section where refcount_bits was used as 'width in bits'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maria Kustova
The 'refcount_bits' term used in the description of refcount block entry is
not defined in the specification. The definition is added in the
'refcount_order' section where refcount_bits was used as 'width in bits'.
Signed-off-by: Maria Kustova
---
docs/specs/qcow2.txt | 5 +++--
1 file changed,
