On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 01:08:01PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 04/05/12 13:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > These are pretty sane requirements to move forward with glib usage.
> > 2.12 is the version found in RHEL/CentOS 5, and 2.20 is the
> > first version to support g_poll. Without g_poll, we c
On 16 April 2012 12:08, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 04/05/12 13:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> These are pretty sane requirements to move forward with glib usage.
>> 2.12 is the version found in RHEL/CentOS 5, and 2.20 is the
>> first version to support g_poll. Without g_poll, we cannot
>> integrate w
On 04/05/12 13:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> These are pretty sane requirements to move forward with glib usage.
> 2.12 is the version found in RHEL/CentOS 5, and 2.20 is the
> first version to support g_poll. Without g_poll, we cannot
> integrate well with the glib main loop.
We have a glib-related
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> These are pretty sane requirements to move forward with glib usage.
> 2.12 is the version found in RHEL/CentOS 5, and 2.20 is the
> first version to support g_poll. Without g_poll, we cannot
> integrate well with the glib main loop.
It looks l
These are pretty sane requirements to move forward with glib usage.
2.12 is the version found in RHEL/CentOS 5, and 2.20 is the
first version to support g_poll. Without g_poll, we cannot
integrate well with the glib main loop.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
configure | 12 ++--
1 fi
