Am 13.03.2015 um 21:09 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> We've steered users away from QCOW/QCOW2 encryption for a while,
> because it's a flawed design (commit 136cd19 Describe flaws in
> qcow/qcow2 encryption in the docs).
>
> In addition to flawed crypto, we have comically bad usability, and
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 09:09:40PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> We've steered users away from QCOW/QCOW2 encryption for a while,
> because it's a flawed design (commit 136cd19 Describe flaws in
> qcow/qcow2 encryption in the docs).
>
> In addition to flawed crypto, we have comically bad usabi
On 03/13/2015 02:09 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> We've steered users away from QCOW/QCOW2 encryption for a while,
> because it's a flawed design (commit 136cd19 Describe flaws in
> qcow/qcow2 encryption in the docs).
>
> In addition to flawed crypto, we have comically bad usability, and
> plain
I fat-fingered Dan's e-mail address. I apologize for the inconvenience.
We've steered users away from QCOW/QCOW2 encryption for a while,
because it's a flawed design (commit 136cd19 Describe flaws in
qcow/qcow2 encryption in the docs).
In addition to flawed crypto, we have comically bad usability, and
plain old bugs. Let me show you.
= Example images =
I'm going to
