Am 15.03.2017 um 16:09 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> There should be a policy on which BB sets AioContext on the BDS (e.g.
> only the device does it), but apart from that, it should not be an issue.
> >>>
> >>> We don't know which BBs are going to be attached. We don't necessarily
> >>
On 15/03/2017 16:02, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 15.03.2017 um 15:43 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
>> On 15/03/2017 15:30, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 15.03.2017 um 14:39 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
On 15/03/2017 12:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> But we discussed this earlier, and while I'm not com
Am 15.03.2017 um 15:43 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 15/03/2017 15:30, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 15.03.2017 um 14:39 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> >> On 15/03/2017 12:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>> But we discussed this earlier, and while I'm not completely sure any
> >>> more about the detail
On 15/03/2017 15:30, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 15.03.2017 um 14:39 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
>> On 15/03/2017 12:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> But we discussed this earlier, and while I'm not completely sure any
>>> more about the details, I seem to remeber that Paolo said something
>>> along the l
On Wed, 03/15 17:04, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 15.03.2017 16:13, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Wed, 03/15 13:06, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > > Stefan, Paolo, do you remember the details why we didn't even do a
> > > > > simple fix like the one below? I think there were some patches on the
> > >
Am 15.03.2017 um 14:39 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 15/03/2017 12:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > But we discussed this earlier, and while I'm not completely sure any
> > more about the details, I seem to remeber that Paolo said something
> > along the lines that AioContext is going away anyway an
15.03.2017 16:13, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Wed, 03/15 13:06, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Stefan, Paolo, do you remember the details why we didn't even do a
simple fix like the one below? I think there were some patches on the
list, no?
ISTM the concern was mostly "what about other BB in the graph?"
Should th
On 15/03/2017 12:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> But we discussed this earlier, and while I'm not completely sure any
> more about the details, I seem to remeber that Paolo said something
> along the lines that AioContext is going away anyway and building the
> code for proper management would be wasted
On Wed, 03/15 13:06, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > >
> > > Stefan, Paolo, do you remember the details why we didn't even do a
> > > simple fix like the one below? I think there were some patches on the
> > > list, no?
> >
> > ISTM the concern was mostly "what about other BB in the graph?"
> >
> > Should
Am 15.03.2017 um 12:14 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> On Wed, 03/15 12:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 14.03.2017 um 18:11 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> > > If we have separate iothread for cdrom, we lose connection to it on
> > > qmp_blockdev_change_medium, as aio_context is on bds wh
On Wed, 03/15 12:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 14.03.2017 um 18:11 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> > If we have separate iothread for cdrom, we lose connection to it on
> > qmp_blockdev_change_medium, as aio_context is on bds which is dropped
> > and switched with new one.
> >
> > As
Am 14.03.2017 um 18:11 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> If we have separate iothread for cdrom, we lose connection to it on
> qmp_blockdev_change_medium, as aio_context is on bds which is dropped
> and switched with new one.
>
> As an example result, after such media change we have
If we have separate iothread for cdrom, we lose connection to it on
qmp_blockdev_change_medium, as aio_context is on bds which is dropped
and switched with new one.
As an example result, after such media change we have crash on
virtio_scsi_ctx_check: Assertion `blk_get_aio_context(d->conf.blk) ==
13 matches
Mail list logo
