> > Will this work also for the CL542x adaptor? (Does that fall in the
> > category of vga?) My current hack works for with/without -std-vga and I
> > think that's because it lives "underneath" both, in the connection to
> > SDL.
>
> Each adapter will have to do it's own minimization but that's s
Julian Seward wrote:
On Friday 16 March 2007 18:40, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hi Julian,
Julian Seward wrote:
Here is a somewhat revised version of a patch I first made nearly
three years ago. The original thread is
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2004-07/msg00263.html
It
On Friday 16 March 2007 18:40, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Julian Seward wrote:
> > Here is a somewhat revised version of a patch I first made nearly
> > three years ago. The original thread is
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2004-07/msg00263.html
> >
> > It still
Hi Julian,
Julian Seward wrote:
Here is a somewhat revised version of a patch I first made nearly
three years ago. The original thread is
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2004-07/msg00263.html
It still uses a shadow frame buffer. Fabrice mentioned this is not
necessary
I t
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Julian Seward wrote:
> In fact I obtained (by far) the best remote X performance by using both
> this patch and making the remote X connection with "ssh -XC -o
> CompressionLevel=1". The patch knocks out the majority of the data, and
> the ssh compression squashed wha
On Wednesday 14 March 2007 04:57, Mark Williamson wrote:
> > > Here is a somewhat revised version of a patch I first made nearly
> > > three years ago. The original thread is
> >
> > The idea here is quite similar to what the VNC server does now.
> >
> > If this is desirable for SDL too, then perh
> > Here is a somewhat revised version of a patch I first made nearly
> > three years ago. The original thread is
>
> The idea here is quite similar to what the VNC server does now.
>
> If this is desirable for SDL too, then perhaps we should find a way to
> fold this into common code?
>
> Althoug
Julian Seward wrote:
Here is a somewhat revised version of a patch I first made nearly
three years ago. The original thread is
The idea here is quite similar to what the VNC server does now.
If this is desirable for SDL too, then perhaps we should find a way to
fold this into common code
Here is a somewhat revised version of a patch I first made nearly
three years ago. The original thread is
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2004-07/msg00263.html
The patch makes QEMU's graphics emulation much more usable over remote
X connections, by reducing the amount of data sent
