Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> > Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > > Staying backwards compatible in this case is so easy, it is not even
> > > funny. (And certainly no reason to groan over having to support it.)
> >
> > A undirected remark
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> > I think I fixed it. Since I am not your regular Windows user (I only
> > use Windows when I have to), I cannot tell if it works, though.
> >
> > It is here:
> > http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/dscho.git?a=shortlog;h=diskgeo
Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> I think I fixed it. Since I am not your regular Windows user (I only use
>
> Windows when I have to), I cannot tell if it works, though.
>
> It is here: http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/dscho.git?a=shortlog;h=diskgeometry
>
> Any testing (especially the physical drive on Wind
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > Staying backwards compatible in this case is so easy, it is not even
> > funny. (And certainly no reason to groan over having to support it.)
>
> A undirected remark to the general public: If somebody comes up wi
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
>
> > 2007/10/22, Stefan Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Ivan Kalvachev schrieb:
> > > > According to http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365171.aspx
> > > >
> > > > this function requires Win XP or Vista.
> >
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> 2007/10/22, Stefan Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Ivan Kalvachev schrieb:
> > > According to http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365171.aspx
> > >
> > > this function requires Win XP or Vista.
> > > Is qemu supported only on these?
> > Good q
2007/10/22, Stefan Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ivan Kalvachev schrieb:
> > According to http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365171.aspx
> >
> > this function requires Win XP or Vista.
> > Is qemu supported only on these?
> Good question. The old IOCTL_DISK_GET_DRIVE_GEOMETRY
> was also suppo
Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> >longer than MS does? It would make things easier if we
> >dropped support for W2K hosts.
> >
> Surely not?!? I've heard of people being off hand about supporting
> Win95/98 (and I would agree with that) et al..., but surely W2K support
> should be sacrosanct ?!?
I would h
Hi,
Stefan Weil wrote:
longer than MS does? It would make things easier if we
dropped support for W2K hosts.
Surely not?!? I've heard of people being off hand about supporting
Win95/98 (and I would agree with that) et al..., but surely W2K support
should be sacrosanct ?!?
Regards,
Shaddy
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Ivan Kalvachev schrieb:
> > According to http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365171.aspx
> >
> > this function requires Win XP or Vista.
> > Is qemu supported only on these?
>
> Good question. The old IOCTL_DISK_GET_DRIVE_GEOMETRY was also supp
Ivan Kalvachev schrieb:
> According to http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365171.aspx
>
> this function requires Win XP or Vista.
> Is qemu supported only on these?
Good question. The old IOCTL_DISK_GET_DRIVE_GEOMETRY
was also supported for W2K. Will QEMU support W2K as a host
longer than M
2007/10/19, Stefan Weil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> raw harddisk access for Windows (//./PhysicalDrive0) gives wrong disk sizes.
> You can check this by booting a harddisk with the GRUB bootloader installed
> and using GRUB's geometry command.
>
> The current QEMU code uses IOCTL_DISK_GET_DRIVE_
Hi,
raw harddisk access for Windows (//./PhysicalDrive0) gives wrong disk sizes.
You can check this by booting a harddisk with the GRUB bootloader installed
and using GRUB's geometry command.
The current QEMU code uses IOCTL_DISK_GET_DRIVE_GEOMETRY which is marked
as obsolete by MS.
The appended
13 matches
Mail list logo
