On 09/12/2011 08:53 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/12/2011 04:46 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
On 09/12/2011 06:07 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/11/2011 02:38 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 11.09.2011 um 12:41 schrieb Avi Kivity:
> On 09/08/2011 07:54 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> PS: Please te
On 12 September 2011 14:53, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Another option is, now that the binary name 'qemu' is available for general
> use, make it possible to invoke everything with just one binary:
>
> qemu -system -target mips ...
Sounds reasonable, but we should probably make sure this (and
more sign
On 09/12/2011 10:53 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/12/2011 04:46 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
Yes, that would also work, having different variants with different
qemu and qemu-img paths. Those binaries would have to be already
pre-built, but then we miss the ability autotest has of building
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/12/2011 04:46 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
>>
>> On 09/12/2011 06:07 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/11/2011 02:38 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 11.09.2011 um 12:41 schrieb Avi Kivity:
> On 09/08/2011 07:54 PM
On 09/12/2011 04:46 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
On 09/12/2011 06:07 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/11/2011 02:38 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 11.09.2011 um 12:41 schrieb Avi Kivity:
> On 09/08/2011 07:54 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> PS: Please test your patches. This one could have been f
On 09/12/2011 06:07 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/11/2011 02:38 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 11.09.2011 um 12:41 schrieb Avi Kivity:
> On 09/08/2011 07:54 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> PS: Please test your patches. This one could have been found with
an invocation
>> as simple as "qemu-system-ppc"
On 12.09.2011, at 11:07, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/11/2011 02:38 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Am 11.09.2011 um 12:41 schrieb Avi Kivity:
>>
>> > On 09/08/2011 07:54 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> >> PS: Please test your patches. This one could have been found with an
>> >> invocation
>> >>
On 09/11/2011 02:38 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 11.09.2011 um 12:41 schrieb Avi Kivity:
> On 09/08/2011 07:54 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> PS: Please test your patches. This one could have been found with an
invocation
>> as simple as "qemu-system-ppc". We boot into the OpenBIOS prompt
Am 11.09.2011 um 12:41 schrieb Avi Kivity :
> On 09/08/2011 07:54 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> PS: Please test your patches. This one could have been found with an
>> invocation
>> as simple as "qemu-system-ppc". We boot into the OpenBIOS prompt by
>> default,
>> so you wouldn't even ha
On 09/08/2011 07:54 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
PS: Please test your patches. This one could have been found with an invocation
as simple as "qemu-system-ppc". We boot into the OpenBIOS prompt by
default,
so you wouldn't even have required a guest image or kernel.
Sorry about that.
Am 08.09.2011 um 18:54 schrieb Alexander Graf:
Commit 23c5e4ca (convert to memory API) broke the VIA Cuda emulation
layer
by not registering the IO structs.
This patch registers them properly and thus makes -M g3beige and -M
mac99
work again.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
Tested-by: An
Commit 23c5e4ca (convert to memory API) broke the VIA Cuda emulation layer
by not registering the IO structs.
This patch registers them properly and thus makes -M g3beige and -M mac99
work again.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
---
PS: Please test your patches. This one could have been found wit
12 matches
Mail list logo
