On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:13:58PM +0800, Chao Fan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:37:30PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:29:43PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> Chao Fan wrote:
> >> > In hmp, dirty-bytes-rate is more friendly than dirty-pages-rate.
> >> > It's
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:37:30PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:29:43PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Chao Fan wrote:
>> > In hmp, dirty-bytes-rate is more friendly than dirty-pages-rate.
>> > It's also better for other tools to determine the cpu throttle
>> > valu
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 09:54:34AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>On 03/14/2017 05:27 AM, Chao Fan wrote:
>> In hmp, dirty-bytes-rate is more friendly than dirty-pages-rate.
>> It's also better for other tools to determine the cpu throttle
>> value in different architecture.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao F
On 03/14/2017 05:27 AM, Chao Fan wrote:
> In hmp, dirty-bytes-rate is more friendly than dirty-pages-rate.
> It's also better for other tools to determine the cpu throttle
> value in different architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian
> ---
In addition to the (good)
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:29:43PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>Chao Fan wrote:
>> In hmp, dirty-bytes-rate is more friendly than dirty-pages-rate.
>> It's also better for other tools to determine the cpu throttle
>> value in different architecture.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan
>> Signed-off-by:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:37:30PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:29:43PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Chao Fan wrote:
>> > In hmp, dirty-bytes-rate is more friendly than dirty-pages-rate.
>> > It's also better for other tools to determine the cpu throttle
>> > valu
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:29:43PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Chao Fan wrote:
> > In hmp, dirty-bytes-rate is more friendly than dirty-pages-rate.
> > It's also better for other tools to determine the cpu throttle
> > value in different architecture.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Fan
> > Signed-
Chao Fan wrote:
> In hmp, dirty-bytes-rate is more friendly than dirty-pages-rate.
> It's also better for other tools to determine the cpu throttle
> value in different architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian
I agree with Daniel here, you can't change the meaning o
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:45:16AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:27:47PM +0800, Chao Fan wrote:
>> In hmp, dirty-bytes-rate is more friendly than dirty-pages-rate.
>> It's also better for other tools to determine the cpu throttle
>> value in different architecture.
>>
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:27:47PM +0800, Chao Fan wrote:
> In hmp, dirty-bytes-rate is more friendly than dirty-pages-rate.
> It's also better for other tools to determine the cpu throttle
> value in different architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian
> ---
> hmp.c
In hmp, dirty-bytes-rate is more friendly than dirty-pages-rate.
It's also better for other tools to determine the cpu throttle
value in different architecture.
Signed-off-by: Chao Fan
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian
---
hmp.c | 6 +++---
migration/migration.c | 2 +-
qapi-schema.json
11 matches
Mail list logo