On 4 October 2012 11:23, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 04.10.2012 14:07, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> The hassle and compile time overhead of maintaining both 32-bit and 64-bit
>> capable source isn't worth the tiny performance advantage which is seen on
>> a minority of configurations. Switch to compiling
On 04.10.2012 14:07, Avi Kivity wrote:
> The hassle and compile time overhead of maintaining both 32-bit and 64-bit
> capable source isn't worth the tiny performance advantage which is seen on
> a minority of configurations. Switch to compiling libhw only once, with
> target_phys_addr_t unconditio
The hassle and compile time overhead of maintaining both 32-bit and 64-bit
capable source isn't worth the tiny performance advantage which is seen on
a minority of configurations. Switch to compiling libhw only once, with
target_phys_addr_t unconditionally typedefed to uint64_t.
Signed-off-by: Av
