On 14 December 2011 09:55, Alex Rozenman wrote:
> Thank you for your comments. I'll submit a new patch. I am aware about
> architertural differences b/w v6m and v7m, but many of them is less
> relevant for the existing QEMU code (pririty bits for example).
My concern really is that at the moment
Hi Peter,
Thank you for your comments. I'll submit a new patch. I am aware about
architertural differences b/w v6m and v7m, but many of them is less
relevant for the existing QEMU code (pririty bits for example).
Alex
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 18:05 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 December 2011
On 13 December 2011 18:11, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Please rebase against Peter's target-arm branch:
>
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/pmaydell/qemu-arm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/target-arm.next
Note that this .next branch rebases, so treat it with the appropriate
degree of caution.
(I'
On 12/13/2011 09:44 AM, Alex Rozenman wrote:
> +if (IS_V6M(env))
> +goto illegal_op;
Also run your patch through scripts/checkpatch.pl. Which should have
told you that you need braces here and elsewhere.
r~
Hi,
Am 13.12.2011 18:44, schrieb Alex Rozenman:
> Please review / discuss / push the attched patch. It adds initial
> support for V6-M for ARM and Cortex-M0.
Please send this as an inline patch (git send-email) and cc Peter.
Some comments:
Please rebase against Peter's target-arm branch:
http:
On 13 December 2011 17:44, Alex Rozenman wrote:
> Please review / discuss / push the attched patch. It adds initial support
> for V6-M for ARM and Cortex-M0.
Please don't submit patches as attachments (see
http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch for other guidelines).
This patch is pretty o
Hi,
Please review / discuss / push the attched patch. It adds initial
support for V6-M for ARM and Cortex-M0.
Best regards,
Alex Rozenman
>From ff09b4ef970cde304c170c6e0a7678d2486b63e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Rozenman
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:28:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Initial su
