Gerd Hoffmann writes:
>> I don't know of a good way to deal with the situation where the new
>> client is unable to handle existing surfaces.
>
> We need a sensible solution here. If we can't handle capability
> downgrade at runtime the capability negotiation between guest and client
> doesn't m
On 08/29/12 02:58, Søren Sandmann wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann writes:
>
>> On 08/27/12 19:20, Søren Sandmann Pedersen wrote:
>>> From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen
>>>
>>> The client_present field is a byte that is set of non-zero when a
>>> client is connected and to zero when no client is connected.
>>>
Gerd Hoffmann writes:
> On 08/27/12 19:20, Søren Sandmann Pedersen wrote:
>> From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen
>>
>> The client_present field is a byte that is set of non-zero when a
>> client is connected and to zero when no client is connected.
>>
>> The client_capabilities[58] array contains 46
On 08/27/12 19:20, Søren Sandmann Pedersen wrote:
> From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen
>
> The client_present field is a byte that is set of non-zero when a
> client is connected and to zero when no client is connected.
>
> The client_capabilities[58] array contains 464 bits that indicate the
> capab
From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen
The client_present field is a byte that is set of non-zero when a
client is connected and to zero when no client is connected.
The client_capabilities[58] array contains 464 bits that indicate the
capabilities of the client. Each bit corresponds to a
SPICE_DISPLAY_C
