On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 04:58:46 -0700
Li Qiang wrote:
> From: Li Qiang
>
> In 9pfs read dispatch function, it doesn't free two QEMUIOVector
> object thus causing potential memory leak. This patch avoid this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Qiang
> ---
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz
> hw/9pfs/9p.c | 5 +++--
>
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 04:58:46 -0700
Li Qiang wrote:
> From: Li Qiang
>
> In 9pfs read dispatch function, it doesn't free two QEMUIOVector
> object thus causing potential memory leak. This patch avoid this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Qiang
> ---
When you post an updated version of a patch, you shou
From: Li Qiang
In 9pfs read dispatch function, it doesn't free two QEMUIOVector
object thus causing potential memory leak. This patch avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Li Qiang
---
hw/9pfs/9p.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p.c b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
index
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:42:26 -0700
Li Qiang wrote:
> From: Li Qiang
>
> In 9pfs read dispatch function, it doesn't free two QEMUIOVector
> object thus causing potential memory leak. This patch avoid this.
>
Good catch for the leak, but I'd prefer another fix. See below.
> Signed-off-by: Li Q
From: Li Qiang
In 9pfs read dispatch function, it doesn't free two QEMUIOVector
object thus causing potential memory leak. This patch avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Li Qiang
---
hw/9pfs/9p.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p.c b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
index d960a2e..b1ff8e7
