On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:31:25AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> > On 23 Sep 2016, at 22:21, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 02:00:06PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> My preference would be a new flag to the existing commands, with
> >> explicit documentation that 0 offset a
On 24.09.2016 23:14, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 24.09.2016 19:33, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
On 24.09.2016 20:13, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
I agree that requests larger than disk size are ugly.. But splitting
request brings me again to idea of having separate command or
On 24.09.2016 19:33, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 24.09.2016 20:13, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> I agree that requests larger than disk size are ugly.. But splitting
>> request brings me again to idea of having separate command or flag
>> for clearing the whole disk without th
> On 23 Sep 2016, at 22:21, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 02:00:06PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>> My preference would be a new flag to the existing commands, with
>> explicit documentation that 0 offset and 0 length must be used with that
>> flag, when requesting a full-devic