On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:26:15PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Do we still want to require servers to always send 16 extents (when not
> > limited to exactly 1), or is it better to just state that as long as the
> > server sends at least one extent (so that the client can make progress),
> >
On 12/12/2016 02:26 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>>
>>> This section describes the value and meaning of constants (other than
>>> @@ -768,8 +814,6 @@ The field has the following format:
>>>to that command to the client. In the absense of this flag, clients
>>
>> drive-by typo fix applicable
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 01:58:26PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/12/2016 12:21 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > diff from v3 to v4:
> > - Remove some repetitive wording (some sections were written more than
> > once);
> > - Rework the text to remove all lingering remains of the "extension"
> >
